| 
               Claudia Rauhut (2012) Santería und ihre Globalisierung in Kuba. Tradition und Innovation in einer afrokubanischen Religion Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 340 S.  | 
          
          Reviewed by Andreas Hofbauer 
Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP
        
Grounded in wide-ranging bibliographic research and, above all, her own in-depth fieldwork carried out in Havanna, Claudia Rauhut’s book analyzes how, at a time when Santería is spreading out into the world, conceptions of the religion are disputed and remodelled by followers themselves, revealing how the construction of transnational networks has affected its discourses and practices, prompting both negotiations and conflicts.
          In exploring this topic, Rauhut‘s compelling study adopts an
          innovative methodological approach: she aims to evaluate
          globalization processes from a micro perspective. The German
          anthropologist shows that processes of transnationalization
          are not necessarily the outcome of migratory processes.
          Santería can be understood as a religious form of
          transnationalization produced locally by religious leaders
          who, generally speaking, are unable to leave Cuba. By
          integrating foreigners through the periodic ritual obligations
          to their familias rituales they construct transnational
          networks that allow them to win prestige and participate
          authoritatively in the global dialogues on the religion of the
          Orishas.
          The book opens with the author’s critical examination of some
          key concepts (secularization, religion) from which she
          develops the theoretical baseline for her approach. Debating
          the categories of diaspora and transnationalization, Rauhut
          explores the works of two renowned anthropologists that serve
          as her main theoretical inspiration: both J. Lorand Matory’s
          thesis concerning the transnational genesis of the Yoruba
          (1999) and Stephan Palmié’s notion of “a politics and poetics
          of Africanization” (2008) express analytic positions that
          incorporate the maxims of the ‘discursive turn’ and look to
          break with notions such as structure, values and essentials,
          evoked by the classic concept of culture.
          The historical chapters begin with an analysis of the first
          studies on Santería which reveal, among other things, that the
          pioneer in this field of research, Fernando Ortiz, not only
          dialogued with scientists investigating ‘African religiosity’
          in Brazil (Raimundo Nina Rodrigues, Roger Bastide), but was
          also inspired by important works written by Africans living in
          what is today Nigeria (Samuel Ajayi Crowther, Rev. Samuel
          Johnson). In the highly enlightening Chapters 5 and 6, Rauhut
          utilizes a wealth of details to show how the Cuban revolution
          dealt with the forms of religiosity associated with the former
          slaves. In appropriating the notion of ‘Afro-Cuban folklore’
          coined by Ortiz, the revolutionary leaders tended to treat
          Santería as a part of national culture (folklore). The change
          in religious policy at the start of the 1990s (the abandonment
          of scientific atheism in favour of the defence of secular
          principles) cleared the way for the globalization and
          revitalization of Afro-Cuban religious traditions.
          Next, Rauhut focuses on the local and global processes behind
          the emergence of a transnational interest in the ‘African
          side’ of Cuba, which also stimulated tourism and provided an
          important source of foreign currency for the revolutionary
          government. With considerable skill, the author analyzes how,
          in this context shaped by tensions between forces encouraging
          the commercialization of Santería and the state control of the
          religion, local actors have emerged who have built
          transnational networks with the aim of spreading their vision
          of Santería and attracting ‘clients,’ many of them tourists.
          Mutual accusations, ranging from a lack of authenticity to the
          pursuit of merely economic interests in performing the
          rituals, inform the internal and transnational disputes where
          the issue of tradition’s purity becomes a fundamental
          discursive resource.
          Amid the contemporary religious elite, Rauhut locates two
          discursive extremes concerning the Santería tradition. The
          first, disseminated by the Asociación Cultural Yoruba de Cuba,
          asserts that the roots of Santería lie in the Caribbean island
          and that, given the cultural losses caused by the advance of
          Islam and Christianity in Africa, today it can be considered
          the most authentic form of the Yoruban tradition. Since this
          is the only organization to receive state recognition, it
          tends to act as an official regulatory body that connects the
          defence of Santería to the defence of national identity.
The other, minority pole, the línea africana, fervently works to combat any influence identified with Christianity. It can be divided into two currents: the first seeks to revive traditions that stem back to the very beginnings of Cuban colonization (Lúkúmízación), while the second grounds its religious recognition in dialogue and more direct exchanges with Nigerian leaders (Yorubización). Rauhut’s analysis reveals, however, that these discourses can change according to their interlocutors and the contexts.
          For the purposes of the study, though, it does not matter
          whether the discourses coincide with practices or whether
          Santería objectively becomes ‘more African’ or not. The focus
          of the research is on investigating “when, how and by whom
          Africa and the Yoruba are evoked to legitimize certain
          practices” (p. 187). Congruent with her theoretical
          perspective, the researcher argues that the search for roots
          and the systematic construction of transnational networks and
          bridges with Africa should also be understood as empirical
          practices, a dimension that – and this is an important
          critique made by the author – until now has been ignored by
          specialists (p. 197).
          Rauhut does not deny that the tendencies towards
          Africanization have the potential to foreground the theme of
          race. However she opts not to tackle the question of colour
          and phenotypes in her work, thereby leaving unanswered some
          interesting questions, such as: to what point is ritual purity
          related—and by whom—to the colour/race of the priests? Is
          Africanness/Yorubaness always imagined colour-free? Even if
          the nationalist discourse on mestizo identity may have
          ‘softened’ the colonial ideology of white supremacy–something
          that would need to be demonstrated–for non-Cubans who enter
          into contact with Santería (Americans, Europeans, Nigerians),
          the black colour/race constitutes an important marker of
          difference often mobilized as a criterion for hierarchization.
          Based on the vast empirical material surveyed, the author ends
          the book by returning to the theoretical debate on syncretism
          and, fully in line with her earlier positions, explores the
          reflections of Charles Stewart and Rosalind Shaw (1994).
          Pursuing an approach that conceives discourses as social
          action, while simultaneously foregoing any attempt to identify
          structuring factors in historical and cultural processes,
          Rauhut argues that our notion of syncretism needs to be
          reconsidered. Syncretism will only make sense as an analytic
          category when our analysis focuses on the interests,
          discourses and projects of religious followers, looking to
          study how these agents, in concrete contexts shaped by power
          relations, seek to extend or defend their religious frontiers.
          In the final chapter, Rauhut summarizes the main theses of her
          valuable work, which not only brings studies of Santería back
          up to date, but also innovates in two important ways: firstly
          by providing an insight into the local disputes and discourses
          concerning the tradition, precisely at a time when Santería is
          gaining wider recognition beyond the Cuban context. And
          secondly, by revealing not only the many historical
          connections and exchanges, but also, above all, the impact of
          contemporary networks, Rauhut begins to fill a gap in studies
          of the Black Atlantic, which have neglected—as the author
          criticizes—the Cuban perspective in their analyses. Indeed the
          research findings prompt her to make a final and somewhat
          provocative suggestion: rather than seeing Cuba as part of the
          African diaspora, we could conceive the Caribbean island as a
          discursive centre generating Yoruban practices worldwide.
          The book is recommended to specialists in Afro-Diasporic
          religions and to all those interested in the anthropology and
          history of the populations transplanted from Africa to the New
          World.
          Bibliography
          Matory, James Lorand (1999): “Afro-Atlantic Culture: on the
          Live Dialogue between Africa and the Americas”, in: Appiah,
          Anthony; Gates, Henry Louis (eds.): Africana: the Encyclopedia
          of the African and African American Experience, New York:
          Basis Civitas Books, pp.93-104.
          Palmié, Stephan (2008): “Introduction: on Predications of
          Africanity”, in: Palmié, Stephan (eds.): Africas in the
          Americas: Beyond the Search for Origins in the Study of
          Afro-Atlantic Religions. Leiden: Brill, pp. 1-37.
          
        
Stewart,
          Charles & Shaw, Rosalind (eds.) (1994): “Syncretism /
          Anti-Syncretism: the Politics of Religious Synthesis”, London:
          Routledge, pp. 7-35.